fbpx Skip to main content

FUTURES RISE AS TARIFF RULING AND NVIDIA PROFITS BOOST GLOBAL OPTIMISM

Table of Contents

Where Are Markets Today?

U.S. and European stock futures jumped Monday on a tide of hopeful sentiment after a U.S. Federal court decision against former President Donald Trump’s “reciprocal” tariffs and after Nvidia posted a second set of higher-than-expected earnings. By this morning, S&P 500 futures are up 1.6%, Nasdaq 100 futures have gained 2%, and Dow futures have added 511 points (1.2%). Euro Stoxx 50 futures have risen 1.4%, with Germany’s DAX futures 1.3% higher, on a steeply improved sentiment on the back of a technology-driven rally and a receding of trade war concerns.

Markets are firmly higher today on two clear drivers. Firstly, the U.S. Court of International Trade ruled that Trump had overstepped executive powers in issuing retaliatory tariffs—leading to a court order for those tariffs to be canceled. This has sent a clear message to markets that one source of global trade tensions is potentially unraveling, not least for European exporters that had been on the receiving end of those tariffs. Secondly, Nvidia’s earnings blowout and stronger forward guidance once more confirmed investor faith in the strength of the tech sector and AI-driven revenues. This had a trickle-down effect on U.S. and European chipmakers and on the wider tech indexes.

For Europe, gains today not only reflect favorable spillover from Wall Street, but also welcome relief that a pivotal transatlantic trade barrier can now be legally eliminated. Autos, luxury products, and industrial equipment—industries most exposed to U.S.-EU trade tensions—will benefit most. Furthermore, the possibility of more normalized trade patterns could provide a tailwind to Q3 corporate profits in the Eurozone. On the United States front, optimists can be fueled by the hope of possibly re-setting the trade agenda for the next cycle. As global supply chains are already strained and inflation gradually easing, the taking down of some tariffs could ease import pressure and improve margin expansion for manufacturing and retail. We expect today’s rally in futures to extend through to a solid open, although investor focus would again turn towards PMI data and Fed gossip later during the week.

Major Index Performance through June 23, 2025

  • S&P 500: 5,891.40, -0.4% as mega-cap weakness weighs heavily on broader sentiment.
  • Nasdaq Composite: Down 0.9% at 13,601.20 due to intensified tech
  • Dow Jones Industrial Average: down 0.2% at 38,540.30, demonstrating relative strength in the face of strength in healthcare and energy.
  • Russell 2000: 2,082.15, down 0.6%, also showing weakness among the small caps amid the tighter credit environment. 

The Magnificent Seven and the S&P 500

Narrowing breadth continues to haunt the S&P 500. While headline returns stand near multi-month highs, the index is increasingly reliant on a select group of mega-cap stalwarts—aka the “Magnificent Seven”: Apple, Microsoft, Nvidia, Meta, Amazon, Alphabet, and Tesla

Some of these names are under scrutiny today:

  • Nvidia declined 2.3% on reports of reduced chip orders from Asia.
  • Tesla declined 3.8% on news of European regulatory setbacks.
  • Apple declined 1.1% on disappointing iPhone shipment figures.
  • Amazon and Alphabet posted slim losses as they received revised growth projections from several top analysts.

Drivers behind the Market Move

Investors are on a roller-coaster ride today, thanks to a combination of geopolitical developments, macroeconomic figures, and high-level political gamesmanship. These are the three principal drivers propelling U.S. and European markets:

1. Geopolitical risk through Middle East tensions

The threatened surprise military attack on Iran’s nuclear facilities by the last President reignited concerns for broader conflict in the region, including potentially the disruption of the Strait of Hormuz. While that has underpinned demand for conventional safe-haven assets, it’s also lifted the U.S. dollar and world bond yields. This morning’s equity futures are rebounding, partially on relief that U.S. court rulings (striking down Trump’s tit-for-tat tariffs) are calming trade tensions—but volatility remains since risk premia are being repriced in the oil, gold, and defense spaces.

2. Political Signaling and Domestic Policy Uncertainty 

The wave of hawkish rhetoric—ranging from threats of military intervention against Iran to gripes about domestic holidays—highlights heightened policy uncertainty. Markets are interpreting these communiqués to be calling for foreign aggression along with regulatory or legislative reform domestically. Although a tariffs relief saw a wave of relief, sustained political rhetoric is maintaining a tone of uncertainty. This is setting a late-June environment in which capital rotation prefers defense, commodities, and cyclical export sectors—restraining risk-on appetite.

3. Future PMI Reports & Housing

Markets anticipate today’s flash Purchasing Managers’ Indices for the U.S., U.K., Germany, and Eurozone, and Existing Home Sales. Bases are low following last week’s soft Philly Fed Manufacturing read (at -4.0) that added to growth headwinds. Soft PMIs once again would pile pressure on equity valuations and fuel rate-cut hopes. Positive surprises, on the other hand, may revive investor optimism and ease ongoing risk aversion—potentially supporting a cyclical stock recovery and reducing pressure on safe-havens. These three factors colliding—geopolitical tensions, domestic policy uncertainty, and directional Macro data—collectively are fueling positioning for today’s market open. Traders are on their toes, tracking data surprises and political headline news for volatility direction and flow clues.

DIGESTING ECONOMIC DATA

The Trump Tweets and Their Implications – Monday, June 23, 2025

Former President Trump’s recent outburst of social media bravado shook international markets, solidifying a risk aversion environment where rhetoric became a key determinant of portfolio positioning. The rhetoric, ranging from home country productivity to foreign policy bluster, has been a one-way effort to reassert American assertiveness on multiple fronts. The message was one of stark clarity, loud voice, and persistence: the United States will attack again if need be and won’t be passive when its sovereignty or national interest is threatened. This position rekindled geopolitical uncertainty, with international investors repricing in anticipation of a heightened conflict risk.

Most striking are Trump’s boasts over the recent US air strikes on Iranian nuclear sites. By openly admitting the destruction of Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan sites and proclaiming America’s strategic aerial supremacy, Trump has now significantly raised the stakes. His description of the operation as a success and replicable—opens the door to additional confrontation in case Iran tries to take its revenge. Markets are interpreting this as a turn from deterrence to preemption, and this lifts the prospects for additional Middle East instability. Accordingly, we’ve seen a clear upwards bias in safe-haven assets such as gold and Bitcoin, with oil higher on fresh supply concerns over possible disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz. At home, Trump’s complaint about the quantity of public holidays—a “expensive burden” on American productivity—foreshadows a tough line on labour policy and economic output. Symbolic in the short term, the remarks can portend regulatory moves to trim perceived fat from the workforce. For the equity markets, that translates to two counterbalancing effects: elevated geopolitical risk to the benefit of defensives and commodities, and a pro-growth, anti-bureaucracy agenda which can sustain cyclicals provided in a stable setting. But until more clarity exists, the market is likely to remain reactive and headline-driven.

With the tone and extent of Trump’s messaging, a populist path of domestic change and a bold foreign policy is reconfirmed. Market participants need to be working in a politically combative and economically uncertain policy environment. In these conditions, the implications for macro hedging, volatility, and capital movements are significant. At Zaye Capital Markets, we are observing closely the evolving dynamic between political signalling and financial markets, with distinct focus on the impact of the Trump narrative on currency sentiment, commodities, and tactical equity positioning.

Jobless Claims Point To Concealed Labour

The 6.2% year-over-year jump in U.S. continuing claims as of mid-June 2025 is a cause of concern about underlying strength in the American labour market. Even though not conventionally seen as a leading indicator, the persistent upward trend is a sign of growing friction in reintegration of the labour force. The report comes at a juncture when earlier expectations of a seamless labour rebound have been badly undermined, with long-term claimants remaining absent from the labour force—perhaps a sign of deeper structural dislocation. To us, the trend can be a sign that perceived labour market tightness conceals sector-specific vulnerabilities due to high interest rates and shifting employer demand.

This challenge is compounded by the broader economic context, including stalled revisions to growth in major economies like the UK, which saw Q2 GDP print at a standstill. Such a context implies the threat of synchronized slowdowns in developed economies, where labour weakness tends to precede consumption and business investment tail-offs. At Zaye Capital Markets, we perceive the currently prevailing persistence of outstanding claims not merely as cyclical noise, but rather an early warning signal to the moderation of wage pressures—albeit whilst both productivity mismatches and skill dislocations intensify. Such trends demand more granular cognizance of employment composition, of which headline numbers constitute but one.

During a period of economic unease, we are focused on fundamentals, not hype. In equities, we’re pointing the way back to under-valued defensive shares—healthcare and utilities—where profitability is less correlated with employment cycles. As analysts, we suggest that you monitor trends in quit rates, average working time, and unit labour costs in order to gauge employer behaviour in these conditions. We’re avoiding consumer discretionary names that are too exposed and suggest replacing them with those with pricing power and stable margin foundations.

Fed’s Inflation Dilemma Resurface

A sudden spike in the number of FOMC members reporting upside risks to core PCE inflation—to a high of 14 as of June 2025—is indicative of increasing concern in the Federal Reserve of ongoing price pressures. While core PCE fell from 2.7% to 2.5% throughout March and April, policymakers are waiting and seeing that the path to the 2% target is longer than initially anticipated. This shifting stance is an expression of a more cautious view where ongoing inflation pressures—particularly those emanating from policy-imposed cost pressures—are no longer transitory but entrenched.

The Federal Reserve’s June 18 rate decision to leave rates unchanged, coupled with a upward revision of its 2025 inflation forecast from 2.7% to 3.0%, reflects a more patient stance. In our view at Zaye Capital Markets, we view this as a rebalancing fueled by both macro imbalances as much as by geopolitical tensions driving price stickiness. Importantly, this aligns with our notion that rate cuts are not by any means a certainty and will remain data dependent on more vigorous disinflationary pressures. Markets can expect a higher-for-longer monetary policy stance, especially in case of wage growth steadying or energy-related cost-push pressures returning in H2.

This condition of measured monetary accommodation is well suited for quality stocks that are underpriced and have good balance sheets and defensive pricing power. Large-cap staples and utilities—particularly those with cost leadership and minimal exposure to import tariffs—present relative value on existing market expectations. As analysts, we recommend tracking forward-looking breakevens of inflation and real yields, along with earnings sensitivities to interest rates. In a data-driven Fed regime, we at Zaye Capital Markets believe that rate clarity can still be uncertain, but pricing restraint is a good leading indicator for positioning for equities.

Dips in Housing Permits Indicate Supply-Side Friction

U.S. housing construction permits declined to a 1.393 million annualized rate during May 2025—a cycle trough. Despite a 7% decline in mortgage rates, construction remains insensitive, emphasizing more fundamental structural limitations such as elevated property costs, through-the-roof insurance premiums, and sticky material costs. This suggests that monetary accommodation alone will not prove sufficient to stimulate residential development, at a time when sentiment among builders remains cautious and forward order bookings remain at sub-trend levels.

At Zaye Capital Markets, we regard the decline not in isolation as a data point but rather the culmination of the lagged effect of the intense cycle of rate hikes that began in 2021. As some of the region’s indicators—permits authorized throughout Europe, for example—may give the sense of forward momentum, U.S. data reflect more proximate supply-side restraints. The depicted lag between permit authorizations and building picks up on a latent concern: capital-intensive industries from real estate could be facing an extended period of realignment, rather than proximate volatility.

On a market value basis, this environment adds to the appeal of under-valued multi-family or commercial property focused real estate investment trusts (REITs) that are immune to suburban home pressure. Investors would need to monitor inventories, backlog of construction, and credit trends on development loans by regional banks. In our opinion at Zaye Capital Markets, the time is right for a tactical tilt towards the housing and construction complex which can deliver protection with future upside as policy conditions manage to alter and affordability stresses re-shuffle buyer behavior.

Twin Foreign And Domestic Headwinds Face Housing Affordability Image

Median U.S. down payments dropped 0.8% annually as of April 2025—the first such decline in nearly two years—indicating a modest but significant shift in home affordability. With the national median home price having risen to $441,738 as of June, buyers are apparently becoming increasingly restricted by their available capital, indicating affordability limits were breached in several key markets. Such a trend speaks not only to limits on consumer liquidity but to the overall moderating effect of prolonged monetary tightening on residential demand.

We perceive this affordability squeeze at Zaye Capital Markets to be a natural consequence of protracted periods of artificially depressed interest rates that bid up prices last decade. With policy normalization now entrenched, a repricing of down payments could be a precursor to a change in the longer-term trajectory of housing market trends. Uncertainty in terms of loan-to-value ratios adds to the uncertainty, though lowering upfront capital suggests consumers are stretching to maintain access—stress indicator, not a strength signal.

Although often discussed in isolation, housing trends cannot be separated from global macro conditions. Geopolitics—i.e., global energy route stresses—pose a second-order inflation threat through energy price volatility, which can drain purchasing power and further impact mortgage affordability. In this context, we believe under-valued infrastructure and energy-efficient home builders offer asymmetrical upside. Real estate CPI subindices and mortgage application rates must be watched very closely by analysts. In a reiteration of what we’ve stated previously, we believe that housing affordability must be analyzed not solely through price, but in terms of global capital flows and macro strength.

Technological Wage Increases Reflect Sectoral Divergence

U.S. pay for jobs in the Information industry rose by 6.2% from year to year through May 2025, by a significant margin more than industries like Mining and Logging at 1.7%. Growing disparity indicates a clear divergence of labour market trends, with tech industries holding price power for skilled workers even when wages are flat elsewhere in the economy. Firm wage growth in the industry indicates continued demand for digital capabilities, presumably with continued enterprise digitalization and AI-driven transformation initiatives.

In our view at Zaye Capital Markets, we see this trend as a signal of shifting structural foundations of the U.S. economy. Those industries based in more technology seem to generate skill premia and productivity spillovers, while those based on physical capital remain susceptible to cyclical weakness. Crucially, the headline wage numbers can mask regional imbalances—tech-led metros continue to post wage inflation at a pace much higher than national averages. This makes the labour market bifurcated, where policy implications and consumption potential are increasingly localized, and no longer uniform.

For investors, this context reinforces the investment case for technology infrastructure and enterprise-software firms—namely those that facilitate migration to the cloud, cybersecurity, and automation. Such firms benefit most from continued wage resilience in terms of better earnings conversion. Earnings-per-employee metrics, geographic recruitment trends, and margin scalability are the most important metrics that analysts should be watching. Our view at Zaye Capital Markets is that sectoral wage data represent a leading indicator of wider capital rotation—and should be watched very closely as monetary conditions shift.

Boomer Lock-In Tightens Housing Supply

New statistics emerging from a poll recently indicate that 34% of Boomers won’t sell their homes, as opposed to just 13–16% of Millennials and Gen Z who won’t. Boomers make up a mere 20% of America but now own 37% of its houses—a generational housing bottleneck. This tightly held ownership is changing the path of real estate turnover, housing market liquidity, and affordability, most significantly in cities where inventory still remains critically constrained.

At Zaye Capital Markets, we think this trend is not simply a demographic anomaly—it’s a matter of strong economic incentives. Many Boomers are tethered with sub-3% mortgage rates secured decades ago and would pay enormous tax penalties on new home purchases in high-cost states, discouraging mobility. This “aging in place” trend diverges from precedent in which older homes downsized into smaller, less asset-intensive residences. Without policy action, the result will be structural undersupply that decreases market fluidity for young, first-time homebuyers.

From a value investment viewpoint, the configuration is well-suited for discounted home builders and price-point–oriented manufactured home firms that respond to affordability needs of younger cohorts. We propose tracking shifts in elder tax policy, home equity loans, and cross-age mobility rates as leading indicators. Our thesis at Zaye Capital Markets is simple: without a policy regime that shifts to foster home turnover, generational home stickiness is the supply-side constraint on residential housing rebound.

Defence Spending—Efficiency Vs Expansion

The US defense budget reached $997 billion, triple China’s $314 billion budget, according to 2024 global defense budgets. America’s dominance on the spending front is reflected by its 3:1 advantage, but it also brings with it questions of efficiency and the return on defense dollars. As global defense spending reached $2.443 trillion—a 6.8% increase year on year—capital investment in defense industries has emerged as an economic engine but a cost pressure point, most notably in geo-strategically exposed territories.

At Zaye Capital Markets, we caution against equating budget size with capability. Structural inefficiencies—decentralized procurement, decentralized accountability, and entrenched contractor networks—dilute spending effectiveness. While defence spending can spur innovation and manufacturing employment, runaway budgets and the lack of accountability risk crowding out other valuable investment. In contrast, more centralized structures with lower cost bases, such as those used by peer nations, will more likely equate to more capability-per-dollar, and by extension, this implies that strategic results—rather than absolute dollars—must influence policy choice.

From an investment angle, excess defence expenditures still benefit aerospace, cyber-security, and dual-purpose technology firms, particularly those unaffected by regulatory risk and with good cost control. R&D-contract ratios, backlog-book ratios, and responsiveness to non-combat applications should be examined by analysts. In our opinion at Zaye Capital Markets, efficient usage of capital—rather than sheer expenditure—actually represents the true test of sectoral health of defence and national security industries.

Indicators From Manufacturing Show Slumping Momentum

The Philadelphia Fed Manufacturing Index fell in June 2025 to -4.0, lower than the -1.5 consensus and building the case for Mid-Atlantic industrial base tightening. Worse is the employment sub-index, which fell to -9.8—lowest since May 2020—suggesting actual factory employment and capacity planning pain. Despite shipments improving moderately to +8.3, overall the picture is not good, particularly given spectacularly plummeting forward-looking indicators.

The 28.9-point drop in the six-month business outlook, now at +18.3, signifies growing uncertainty, perhaps driven by monetary headwinds and chronic supply-side distortions. Regional manufacturing historical trend data show regional industry to be highly rate-sensitive, and that this latest breakdown is a sign of waning business confidence around sticky input costs and trade tensions. At Zaye Capital Markets, we take this divergence—between muted activity and plummeting sentiment—a turn of utmost significance that warrants close tracking of capital expenditure trends and labor volatility in industrial verticals.

Despite these tightening measures, the Federal Reserve left rates unchanged at 4.3% on June 18, possibly giving cyclical relief secondary importance to inflation fighting. This defies precedent, in which similar employment rates have led to pre-emptive easing. We believe low-cost industrial stocks with global exposure and slim cost bases will perform better than their domestically overcapacity-hampered counterparts. PMI components, inventory drawdowns, and producer price indices need to be watched by analysts for early evidence of reacceleration. We are being cautious in our outlook at Zaye Capital Markets too: rate stickiness during a slowing manufacturing cycle poses downside risks to labour-intensive industrial segments.

LEI Drops Between Soft Landing and Slowdown

The U.S. Leading Economic Index (LEI) fell for the sixth consecutive month in May 2025, recording a -0.1% fall. This consistent fall coupled with a six-month growth rate below zero creates a technical recession signal under the “3Ds rule”—where diffusion index as well as growth rate meet specifications. Previously, such falls have preceded a recession within a seven-month lead-time. However, structural changes of the post-2008 economy have moderated the LEI’s forecasting ability somewhat, and hence more cautious interpretation of its signals is warranted.

At Zaye Capital Markets, we see the competing macro story. On the bright side, the deceleration in the rate of decline of LEI, from -1.4% to -0.1%, suggests the economy is slowing its way to stability rather than contraction, tracing the path of a potential soft landing. This is a situation that typically encompasses slowing inflation, moderating growth, and stable employment without entering recession. Such a confluence of events was accomplished quite remarkably during the 2022–2023 Fed tightening cycle. However, manufacturing stress, subpar job generation, and rising job claims put strains on that story.

Markets need to be positioned for asymmetric outcomes. In the period of transition, quality names currently undervalued with minimal debt exposure and good cash flow resilience, especially in industries, can offer relative safety. We suggest careful observing of yield curve dynamics, consumer credit quality, and business investment momentum as leading indicators. We closely monitor the data at Zaye Capital Markets: a soft landing remains possible, yet the room for policy error is now minimal, and downside risk cannot be excluded from the base case.

Upcoming Economic Events

FOMC Member Waller Speaks, French Flash Manufacturing PMI & Flash Services PMI, German Flash Manufacturing PMI & Flash Services PMI, Eurozone Manufacturing & Services PMI, UK Manufacturing & Services PMI, U.S. Manufacturing & Services PMI, Existing Home Sales

As global markets trade between monetary policy tightening and cyclical slowdown, the week’s agenda is crucial. New PMI releases for the US and Europe, home data, and pivotal Fed rhetoric are events that the markets will closely monitor for clues on policy direction, growth momentum, and cross-asset allocation. Here is what we foresee happening in each of these events—and what changes in the forecasts could mean for fund flows.

FOMC Member Waller Speaks

With Waller’s June rate decision now out of the way, market participants will look for clues from Waller regarding intra-Fed policy debates. If we get him acknowledging upside inflation concerns or discomfort with market pricing for cuts, the U.S. dollar will strengthen, and Treasury yields could rise—posing headwinds to rate-sensitive assets like real estate and growth equities. But if we get Waller to talk about the vulnerability of the labor market or the manufacturing recession, a dovish bias would cause July rate cut odds to be repriced higher, leading to a rally in equities, high-yield credit, and commodity-exposed currencies.

French, German, and Eurozone Flash Manufacturing & Services PMIs

These PMI prints are the euro area’s most recent private sector activity and sentiment readings. 

  • A surprise French and German beat would be evidence of stabilisation inside Europe’s industrial core, euro-tightening, European yield curve steepening, and a boost to cyclical equities on the DAX, CAC, and EuroStoxx 600. 
  • Nonetheless, any downside surprises—particularly in German manufacturing—would solidify stagflation angst and rekindle ECB easing speculation. Investors would also want to watch out for eurozone-wide services PMIs; any manufacturing-services disconnect would make the policy message more difficult and cause sector-specific rotation in equities.

UK Manufacturing & Services PMI.

In the UK, where economic resilience comes increasingly into doubt, PMI numbers will be instrumental in shaping Bank of England expectations. 

  • A beat in both manufacturing and services would prop up the pound and encourage hawkish BoE rhetoric, particularly if core inflation-linked elements also rise. That would likely prompt repricing in UK gilt markets and favor domestically exposed equity names. 
  • A soft-print, by contrast, would add to risk of post-Brexit stagnation, weaken the pound, and potentially set the stage for a more dovish BoE bias going into Q3.

U.S. Manufacturing & Services PMI

The US PMI composite will provide rich insight into business performance, price pressure, and labor trends at a time of increasing economic divergences. 

  • A print above consensus would be interpreted by the markets as further verification of underlying economic strength. This would be a bullish tailwind for US equities—cyclical and industrial—steepening the yield curve, and pressure on the Fed to be higher for longer. 
  • A negative surprise, especially in services, would be in line with the recent softening in jobless claims and regional fed data, and would be likely to stimulate defensive groups, cut back rate hike probabilities, and increase demand for Treasuries and gold.

Existing Home Sales (U.S.)

This data will give us a sense of consumer confidence and affordability of property. 

  • A better-than-expected upside would mean resilient demand for homes against higher prices and mortgage rates, and that could make it tough for the Fed to cut without igniting home price inflation. That would benefit homebuilders in the near term but muddy the rate narrative overall. 
  • A sales miss on the downside—especially if coupled with downward revisions—would, on the other hand, probably be sure to trigger a rotation to real estate-sensitive stocks and increase the chances of cuts in rates in the second half. 

Strategic Insight 

This week we look at a sentiment turning-point. With monetary policy on the knife-edge and macro data giving confusing signals, every single release in the docket has the potential to change the current risk-reward dynamic. Investors are cautioned to be nimble, keeping a core position in quality defensives and strategically rotating out of sectors in accordance with proven macro strength. Data beat/miss volatility is set to rise, especially as volumes rise through Q3 positioning changes. We recommend looking closely at forward-looking indicators, cross-market divergences, and policy rhetoric. In a data-driven world, nuance, not narrative, is what will set the course.

Earnings

Earnings – June 20, 2025

  • Accenture plc (ACN

Accenture reported Q3 FY25 revenue of $17.7 billion, or ~8% year-over-year growth. Adjusted EPS was $3.49, vs. expectations of $3.32. New bookings, however, declined ~6% on a sequential basis, which was a cause for concern over future demand. Although the company announced a new AI-focused division, investors must observe the path of enterprise tech spend and the potential for delayed project initiations.

  • Kroger Company (KR

Kroger’s Q1 numbers included $45.1 billion in overall sales, with same-store sales (ex-fuel) up 3.2%. Adjusted EPS was $1.49, just above estimates. Importantly, Kroger said it will close 60 underperforming units, taking a $100 million charge. Investors will need to consider whether restructuring will hold up margin growth in the face of competitive pricing pressures and food inflation.

  • Darden Restaurants, Inc. (DR)

Darden did report Q4 adjusted EPS of $2.98, ahead of the $2.97 consensus. Menu price and commodity input cost reductions helped support margins, but full-year guidance was a little weak at a range of $10.50 to $10.70, below estimates. Same-store traffic trends, labor expenses, and the impact of discretionary spending shifts within the dining category will attract close scrutiny by analysts.

  • Quantum Corporation (QMCO

Quantum posted quarterly revenue of $71.3 million, down from $92.5 million year-over-year. Its GAAP net loss was $20.8 million (−$0.22/share) and its adjusted net loss was $8.4 million (−$0.09/share). Restructuring remains a work in progress, but investors will be monitoring enterprise tape demand and strategic traction with hyperscale customers.

Earnings – June 23, 2025 (Due Today

  • FactSet Research Systems Inc. (FDS) 

FactSet is due to report Q3 earnings with a consensus of $4.31. With demand for analytics holding steady and cyclical pressure on subscription growth, investors will be paying attention to platform growth, client retention, and operating margins, as adjusted for an austerity spending environment at the enterprise level.

  • Commercial Metals Company (CMC)

CMC is expected to report Q3 revenue of $2.04 billion with EPS of $0.75–$0.80, down 21% year over year, as estimated. Margins remain highly sensitive to steel prices and demand from commercial infrastructure. Order backlogs and raw material input volatility commentary should be monitored by investors.

  • KB Home (KBH) 

Consensus is forecasting Q2 revenues of $1.51 billion and earnings of $1.46. The builder had previously mentioned softening in the operating income on an adjusted basis being driven by price pressures around affordability. Its most important metrics to watch include backlog value, cancellations, and gross margin trends, which will signal the impact of higher mortgage rates on first-time buyer activity. 

Stock Market Recap – Monday, June 23, 2025

Global equities began the week off the back foot with markets struggling to absorb conflicting economic data and dovish commentary from central banks. The Federal Reserve most recently signaled a determination to maintain interest rates at current levels in the face of softer inflation measures, citing ongoing threats from global supply chains alongside tariff spillovers. Meanwhile, geopolitical risk is elevated following Iran’s official notice to close the Strait of Hormuz, driving higher volatility in energy markets.

Stock prices

Economic Indicators and Geopolitical Events

Fed remarks and soft regional manufacturing data are influencing Monday’s market sentiment. FOMC members such as Waller and Cook spoke about concern over upside inflation pressure from commodity disruptions, suggesting the Fed might push back rate cuts until Q4. Existing Home Sales data later today should confirm a slowdown in housing momentum.

On the geopolitical front, Iran’s formal declaration of closure of the Strait of Hormuz ignited international trading fears, especially for energy-importing economies. Oil prices surged nearly 4% in initial trade, burdening transport and industrial stocks but boosting energy equities.

The Magnificent Seven and the S&P 500

Narrowing breadth continues to haunt the S&P 500. While headline returns stand near multi-month highs, the index is increasingly reliant on a select group of mega-cap stalwarts—aka the “Magnificent Seven”: Apple, Microsoft, Nvidia, Meta, Amazon, Alphabet, and Tesla

Some of these names are under scrutiny today:

  • Nvidia declined 2.3% on reports of reduced chip orders from Asia.
  • Tesla declined 3.8% on news of European regulatory setbacks.
  • Apple declined 1.1% on disappointing iPhone shipment figures.
  • Amazon and Alphabet posted slim losses as they received revised growth projections from several top analysts.

The bigger lesson? With tech leadership remaining steadfast, the risk of this concentration leaves the S&P at risk to the downside if these names falter. Market participants now warn that without a more sectoral breadth advance, the index could struggle to hold gains to the upside.

Major Index Performance through June 23, 2025

  • S&P 500: 5,891.40, -0.4% as mega-cap weakness weighs heavily on broader sentiment.
  • Nasdaq Composite: Down 0.9% at 13,601.20 due to intensified tech
  • Dow Jones Industrial Average: down 0.2% at 38,540.30, demonstrating relative strength in the face of strength in healthcare and energy.
  • Russell 2000: 2,082.15, down 0.6%, also showing weakness among the small caps amid the tighter credit environment. 

Throughout the week to come, everything hinges on PMI data, housing data, and continued central bank rhetoric. As tensions on the geopolitical front continue to simmer and inflation remains an open policy concern, tactical positioning is paramount.

Gold Price – Monday, June 23, 2025

Gold is trading at $3,363.32 an ounce, off about 0.2% from yesterday’s session. Rhetoric by former President Trump—particularly threats of “decisive and swift” military action against Iran and sudden domestic policy statements—has heightened geopolitical tensions. This more risky tone, along with apprehension regarding supply channel disruption (e.g., through the Strait of Hormuz), continues to support gold as a safe-haven. Profit-taking from last week’s geopolitics-fueled rally is also contributing to pressure on the market.

Meanwhile, the region’s PMI wave, softer-than-projected domestic manufacturing and housing prints, and dovish remarks by Fed officials creating a rate-hold environment are keeping investors on their guard. Gold is benefitting from these macro headwinds—yesterday’s softer data being a good example—by remaining at, or above, higher levels of $3,300. In case the PMI print in the U.S. and Europe today surprises downside, the appeal of gold being a hedge for portfolios can be strengthened, which can drive prices towards the $3,400–$3,450 zone.

Oil Prices – Monday, June 23, 2025

Brent is up at $78.93 per barrel and WTI is up at $75.73 per barrel, up around 2.5% intraday. Prices had surged above the $81 level intraday on raised Middle East geopolitical tensions. The surge came after the vote by the Iranian parliament to approve the closing of the Strait of Hormuz, the major oil shipping route, in a move that increased the threat of a supply cutoff. Although physical shipping routes remain open for now, markets are applying a geopolitical risk premium. The rally has been somewhat tempered by profit-taking and the fact that there has been no direct physical supply impact.

President Trump’s more forceful rhetoric against Iran contributed to the oil’s upside momentum. His comments, like “our military is ready and ready to take any action required” and “we will respond like never before,” infused supply-side concern with further urgency. Traders are factoring in potential U.S.-Iran escalation risks that could affect not only drilling activity but even global shipping logistics. Today’s soft regional economic reports, including a weak Philadelphia Fed Manufacturing Index and further job market softness, assuaged fears of imminent demand collapse, clearing the way for oil to rise.

Europe, the UK, and US Flash PMIs on Friday of next week, along with Existing Home Sales data, will determine near-term energy demand prospects. Below-forecast prints can fuel deceleration hopes and underpin oil prices on bets for looser conditions. And a beat on the PMI print can reassert the strength of demand, fueling the bull case for oil. But geopolitical risks remaining the dominant theme, prices for oil will continue to be driven by headlines during the week.

Bitcoin Prices – Monday, June 23, 2025

Bitcoin is at $101,091, having pulled back from recent highs after a weekend of high volatility driven by geopolitical uncertainty and institutional buying. Despite being off the high, the virtual currency remains in consolidation mode above the psychologically important $100,000 mark. The brief pullback signals a weakening of risk appetite in the face of global uncertainty and economic data still pointing to spotty growth.

Trump’s wave of belligerent language—ranging from threatening military action against Iran to sweeping declarations of US power—has helped to underpin Bitcoin’s dual role as both a geopolitical hedge and long-term inflation hedge. Coupled with policy stimulus, such as a US Strategic Bitcoin Reserve and deregulatory actions of the type that went into dismantling the SEC’s crypto enforcement unit, institutional confidence yet further accelerates. BlackRock’s record highest ETF flows and growing adoption by legacy institutions such as JPMorgan and Goldman Sachs evidence Bitcoin’s adoption at a system level. Weaker-than-forecasted regional economic data last night, such as a fall in the Philly Fed Manufacturing Index and signs of slowing down of housing market activity, have further supported expectations of tepid growth, driving investors to alternative assets. Today’s housing and PMI numbers will be decisive. Weaker prints will be more attractive to Bitcoin by raising the probability of monetary easing, and stronger data can pause momentum at most. In all, Bitcoin remains supported by policy and positioning tailwinds in a weak macro environment.

ETH Prices – Monday, June 23, 2025

Ethereum is trading at $2,234.85 now, falling briefly by almost 2% intraday, with the overall market sentiment being cautious. Intraday volatility has seen ETH float between $2,134 and $2,294, with uncertainty being caused by fund outflows in the situation of some recent ETFs and shifting in the stance of institutions. There may be some near-term selling—especially by retail and ETF vehicles—but the overall scenario sees ETH still maintaining key support points in the face of macro and crypto-related developments.

Whale action has also decisively turned bullish, with large Ethereum wallets accumulating more than 116,000 ETH in recent sessions, including a blockbuster purchase of 48,825 ETH worth more than $127 million. Such action suggests that wealthier investors are taking advantage of price softness and see ETH as being undervalued at current levels. In the meantime, a newly registered $11.3 million outflow from ETH spot ETFs—driven by large fund managers—suggests tactical positioning, not conviction loss. While ETF outflows can be a source of near-term pressure, ongoing whale buying and previous six-week institutional buying provide a countering influence. If Tuesday’s macro data print lower than expected, Ethereum could draw new momentum as investors start rotating back into conviction-backed digital assets.

Disclaimer

Past results are not indicative of future returns. ZayeCapitalMarketss and all individuals affiliated with this site assume no responsibilities for your trading and investment results. The indicators, strategies, columns, articles and all other features are for educational purposes only and should not be construed as investment advice. Information for stock observations are obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but we do not warrant its completeness or accuracy, or warrant any results from the use of the information. Your use of the stock observations is entirely at your own risk and it is your sole responsibility to evaluate the accuracy, completeness and usefulness of the information. You must assess the risk of any trade with your broker and make your own independent decisions regarding any securities mentioned herein.
Open An Account