Experienced traders are rarely certain about the direction of the next significant market move. They may have a primary thesis — “I believe EUR/USD will break higher” — but they also acknowledge the possibility of the alternative scenario. A market that has been consolidating between two well-defined levels could break in either direction with equal technical validity. A major economic data release could surprise in either direction. A geopolitical development could drive risk-on flows just as easily as risk-off.
How does a disciplined trader handle this genuine two-way uncertainty without either ignoring the alternative scenario or placing two simultaneous opposing positions that cancel each other out? The answer — used by professional traders in equity, futures, forex, and commodity markets for decades — is the One Cancels the Other (OCO) order.
An OCO order is a paired order structure in which two orders are linked together such that when one executes, the other is automatically cancelled. It allows a trader to simultaneously prepare for two possible market outcomes — a breakout in either direction, a move to either a profit target or a stop-loss level — with the certainty that only one of the two orders will ever result in a trade. The market chooses which scenario plays out; the OCO structure ensures the appropriate response is automated.
In this comprehensive guide, Zaye Capital Markets explains everything traders need to know about OCO orders: the precise mechanics, every strategic application, how to construct and manage OCO setups for breakout trading and trade exit management, the advantages over manual order management, the limitations and risks, how OCO orders integrate with broader risk management frameworks, and how they are implemented across different trading platforms. This guide connects directly to our foundational coverage of pending orders in forex, stop-loss and take-profit orders, and risk management in forex trading.
What Is an OCO Order? The Precise Definition
A One Cancels the Other (OCO) order is a conditional order pair — two separate orders that are linked by a conditional relationship: if one executes, the other is immediately and automatically cancelled by the broker’s system.
The two orders in an OCO pair are independent in terms of their price triggers and order types, but dependent in terms of their execution: they share a logical link that ensures mutual exclusivity. Only one of the two will ever be filled; the other will be cancelled the moment its partner is triggered.
The canonical structure of an OCO order is a combination of:
- Order A: A pending order above or at a specific price level (typically a buy stop, buy limit, or take-profit target)
- Order B: A pending order below or at a different specific price level (typically a sell stop, sell limit, or stop-loss)
When the market reaches either Order A’s trigger price or Order B’s trigger price — whichever comes first — that order executes and the other is immediately cancelled. The result is exactly one outcome from the two possibilities: either Order A fires and Order B disappears, or Order B fires and Order A disappears.
This mutual cancellation is the defining feature that makes OCO orders unique and powerful. Without it, a trader who places two pending orders on opposite sides of the market would face the risk of both orders executing — once in a whipsaw move — resulting in two simultaneously open positions when only one was intended.
The Two Primary Uses of OCO Orders
OCO orders serve two fundamentally different strategic purposes in trading, each with its own mechanics and optimal application context. Understanding the distinction between these two uses is essential for applying OCO correctly.
Use 1: Entry OCO — Breakout Trading for Uncertain Direction
The first and perhaps most famous use of OCO orders is for breakout entry positioning when the trader is uncertain about the direction of the next significant move but is confident that a significant move is imminent.
The structure: one buy stop order is placed above a resistance level; one sell stop order is placed below a support level. Both orders are linked as an OCO pair. The trader does not know — or does not care — which level will break first. If the market breaks higher, the buy stop executes and the sell stop is immediately cancelled. If the market breaks lower, the sell stop executes and the buy stop is immediately cancelled.
This is the classic bracket order or straddle entry — the trader brackets the current consolidation range with orders on both sides, letting the market determine the direction. The OCO linkage ensures that only one trade results, regardless of which direction the breakout occurs.
Use 2: Exit OCO — Managing an Open Position’s Profit and Loss
The second use of OCO orders is for automated trade exit management on an already-open position. In this context, the OCO pair consists of:
- Order A: A take-profit limit order at the level where the trader wants to close the position at a profit
- Order B: A stop-loss order at the level where the trader wants to close the position to limit losses
When linked as an OCO pair, the position will be closed at whichever level the market reaches first — and the other order is automatically cancelled. If the take-profit is hit, the stop-loss is cancelled. If the stop-loss is hit, the take-profit is cancelled. The position is always closed at exactly one of the two pre-defined levels.
This is the most critical and most important use of OCO in day-to-day trading. In most modern retail forex platforms, attaching a stop-loss and take-profit to an open position effectively creates this OCO relationship automatically — though it is not always labelled as such. When you set both a stop-loss and a take-profit on the same position, the platform treats them as mutually exclusive exit orders: only one will execute, and when it does, the other is cancelled.
Our comprehensive guide on stop-loss and take-profit orders explains the full methodology for setting exit orders effectively — the same principles apply whether the platform labels the structure as an OCO or simply as a standard stop/target pair.
OCO Order Mechanics: A Step-by-Step Worked Example
Nothing clarifies the mechanics of an OCO order like a concrete, worked example. Let us trace an OCO breakout entry through its complete lifecycle.
Setup: EUR/USD Pre-Breakout Consolidation
EUR/USD has been trading in a tight range between 1.0850 (support) and 1.0950 (resistance) for the past five trading days. The Bollinger Bands are in a squeeze — indicating compressed volatility — and RSI is neutral around 50, providing no directional bias. A major US economic release is scheduled tomorrow morning. The trader believes this will trigger a significant move but does not know the direction.
Placing the OCO Breakout Order
The trader places an OCO order consisting of:
- Order A (Buy Stop): Buy 1 lot EUR/USD at 1.0960 (10 pips above resistance), with stop-loss at 1.0900 (60 pips) and take-profit at 1.1080 (120 pips) — 2:1 reward-to-risk
- Order B (Sell Stop): Sell 1 lot EUR/USD at 1.0840 (10 pips below support), with stop-loss at 1.0900 (60 pips) and take-profit at 1.0720 (120 pips) — 2:1 reward-to-risk
- OCO Linkage: Orders A and B are linked — if one executes, the other is immediately cancelled
Scenario A: Bullish Breakout
The economic data is positive for the dollar — wait, EUR/USD rallies sharply on the data surprise (risk-on, EUR buying). Price reaches 1.0960 and the Buy Stop (Order A) executes. The trader is now long 1 lot EUR/USD from 1.0960 with stop at 1.0900 and target at 1.1080.
The sell stop (Order B) is immediately and automatically cancelled. The trader has a single long position open. EUR/USD continues to rally, reaches 1.1080, and the take-profit executes. Trade result: +120 pips profit. Both the take-profit (which executed) and the original sell stop (which was cancelled) are now off the books. The OCO has done its job.
Scenario B: Bearish Breakout
Alternatively: the economic data is negative, EUR/USD falls sharply. Price reaches 1.0840 and the Sell Stop (Order B) executes. The trader is now short 1 lot EUR/USD from 1.0840 with stop at 1.0900 and target at 1.0720. The Buy Stop (Order A) is immediately and automatically cancelled.
EUR/USD continues falling to 1.0720, where the take-profit executes. Trade result: +120 pips profit on the short position. Again, the OCO has efficiently routed the trader into the correct directional trade for the actual market outcome.
Scenario C: The Whipsaw — Why OCO Protects
A third, more dangerous scenario: the data release triggers a sharp spike upward to 1.0960 (triggering the buy stop), immediately followed by a reversal that collapses below 1.0840. This whipsaw is exactly what makes news-event trading risky.
With the OCO in place: Order A (buy stop) executes at 1.0960. Order B (sell stop) is immediately cancelled. The trader is long EUR/USD. The subsequent collapse reaches the stop-loss at 1.0900 (60 pips below entry) — triggering a loss of 60 pips. This is the pre-defined maximum loss, per the risk management framework. Without the OCO linkage, the sell stop would still be active, potentially opening a second short position on the reversal — creating two opposing positions and compounding the confusion and losses.
The OCO’s automatic cancellation prevents double entry — one of its most important protective functions.
OCO as Exit Management: The Stop-Loss / Take-Profit Pair
The most universal application of OCO logic in retail forex trading is the simultaneous stop-loss and take-profit exit structure. While most traders do not explicitly think of this as an OCO order — because platforms handle it transparently — understanding it as OCO logic clarifies why attaching both orders to every position is non-negotiable practice.
Why a Position Needs Both Exits Defined Simultaneously
A position with only a stop-loss (no take-profit) has defined downside protection but relies on manual decision-making for profit-taking — which exposes the trader to the classic behavioural error of watching profits run and then give back when they do not exit in time.
A position with only a take-profit (no stop-loss) has a defined exit on the upside but unlimited downside — the most dangerous configuration possible. An adverse market move that the trader is not actively monitoring can run without limit.
A position with both stop-loss and take-profit — the OCO exit pair — has completely defined risk and reward on both sides. The maximum loss is known before the trade is open. The profit target is defined before the trade is open. The position will be closed at one of the two levels automatically, regardless of whether the trader is watching the market.
This complete pre-definition of both exit scenarios is what the 1% risk rule in trading requires: not just a defined maximum loss (from the stop-loss) but also a defined take-profit that creates a positive reward-to-risk ratio. Together — always set simultaneously, always before the trade opens — they constitute the OCO exit pair that completes every trade’s risk profile.
The Mathematics of the OCO Exit Pair
Let us quantify the importance of the OCO exit pair through expected value mathematics. Consider a trading strategy with a 50% win rate and a 2:1 reward-to-risk ratio (take-profit twice the stop-loss distance).
Expected value per trade = (Win probability × Win amount) − (Loss probability × Loss amount)
= (0.50 × 2R) − (0.50 × 1R) = 1R − 0.5R = +0.5R per trade
This positive expectancy — 0.5R per trade — only holds if the OCO exit pair is consistently respected. If the take-profit is moved further away after being nearly reached (“let it run a bit more”) and the trade subsequently reverses and hits the stop, the actual reward-to-risk ratio of that trade collapses. If the stop-loss is moved further away when price approaches it (“just give it more room”), the actual loss exceeds 1R. Both modifications destroy the mathematical expectancy of the strategy.
The OCO exit pair — set and left alone — is what makes the mathematical expectancy of a positive strategy actually manifest in practice. It is a mechanical enforcement of trade plan discipline.
OCO Orders for Breakout Strategies: Connecting to Volatility Analysis
The breakout entry OCO structure is most powerful when deployed in the context of a genuine, technically-identified volatility compression event — not simply as a general approach to every uncertain situation.
Identifying the Right Market Conditions for an Entry OCO
The ideal conditions for deploying an entry OCO breakout structure are:
- Defined range boundaries: Clear, well-tested support and resistance levels that delineate the consolidation range. The more times these levels have been tested without breaking, the more significant the eventual break is likely to be.
- Low ATR — volatility compression: The current ATR is significantly below its historical average, indicating that the market has been moving less than usual and is building energy for a directional move. This ATR compression is the quantitative confirmation of the range-bound consolidation.
- Bollinger Band Squeeze: The Bollinger Bands have contracted, with the upper and lower bands very close together relative to historical norms. The Bollinger Squeeze is a visual representation of the same volatility compression that low ATR measures quantitatively.
- Neutral momentum indicators: RSI near 50, MACD near zero — indicators showing neither strong bullish nor bearish momentum. Neutral indicators confirm that neither side has yet established directional dominance.
- A known catalyst approaching: A scheduled economic data release, central bank meeting, or other macro event that is likely to provide the directional trigger for the breakout.
When all five conditions are present simultaneously, the entry OCO breakout structure is at its highest probability of capturing a significant, sustained directional move. When conditions are less aligned — for example, when the market is already directional rather than consolidating — the OCO breakout approach is less appropriate.
Positioning OCO Orders Around Key Levels
The specific placement of OCO breakout orders requires attention to avoid two common errors: placing orders too close to the range boundaries (triggering from normal noise before the genuine break) and placing them too far away (missing the breakout momentum and entering at an inferior price).
The standard approach: place buy stop orders 5 to 15 pips above the resistance level (or an ATR-fraction above it), and sell stop orders 5 to 15 pips below the support level. This buffer prevents false triggers from the normal bid-ask spread fluctuation at the boundary while still positioning the entry close enough to the breakout point to capture the initial momentum. Our guide on the complete range of what are trading indicators and how they generate signals provides the analytical context for identifying these boundary levels precisely.
OCO in the Context of Fundamental and Geopolitical Analysis
While OCO orders are most commonly discussed in purely technical terms, their strategic value is significantly enhanced by integrating fundamental and geopolitical context — particularly for the entry OCO breakout structure.
The fundamental backdrop influences both the probability of a breakout occurring and the likelihood of which direction it will occur in. A market consolidating near resistance with a fundamentally strong bullish case (e.g., strong interest rate differential in favour of the base currency) has a higher probability of breaking upward than a technically neutral consolidation. In this case, the entry OCO can be sized or constructed to reflect this asymmetry — perhaps a larger buy stop and a smaller sell stop — while still maintaining protection against the alternative scenario.
Geopolitical events regularly create the precise conditions where OCO entry structures are most valuable: a sharp, directional move in response to a specific development, with real uncertainty about whether that move will be a sustained break or a false spike. Our market analysis documenting how global stock futures signal cautious opens as Iran tensions ease while tariff risks rise illustrates exactly the kind of macro-uncertainty environment where OCO structures allow traders to participate in directional moves without committing to a specific directional thesis before the market has confirmed it.
Related market analysis on events where OCO structures are most relevant:
- Global stock futures edge higher after war-driven selloff and oil shock roil markets
- Global stock futures hold near flat as Iran talks offset escalation risks in volatile markets
- U.S. and European stock futures slide as geopolitical risks and macro uncertainty weigh
Platform Implementation: How to Place OCO Orders
OCO order availability and implementation vary significantly across different trading platforms. Understanding how your specific platform handles OCO orders — and the workarounds available if native OCO support is absent — is a practical prerequisite for using this order structure effectively.
MetaTrader 4 (MT4)
MetaTrader 4, the most widely used retail forex trading platform, does not offer a native OCO order type in its standard form. However, the exit OCO functionality is implemented implicitly: when you attach both a stop-loss and a take-profit to an open position, the platform automatically cancels the remaining order when one is triggered. In this sense, MT4 provides OCO exit logic without explicitly labelling it.
For entry OCO structures (two pending orders linked so one cancels the other on execution), MT4 does not provide native support. Traders using MT4 who want entry OCO functionality typically achieve it through custom Expert Advisors (automated scripts) or through manual monitoring — placing both pending orders and manually cancelling the unfilled one immediately after the other triggers.
MetaTrader 5 (MT5)
MetaTrader 5 offers significantly more advanced order management than MT4 and includes explicit support for one-cancels-the-other order logic in certain configurations. MT5’s native pending order types — including the Buy Stop Limit and Sell Stop Limit — provide more precise execution control in fast markets, and the platform’s netting and hedging account modes allow more flexible multi-order management.
Other Retail Platforms
Many professional and semi-professional retail platforms — cTrader, TradingView-connected brokers, Interactive Brokers, and others — offer explicit, native OCO order functionality with straightforward interface support. If OCO orders are a central part of your trading strategy, confirming that your chosen platform supports them natively — before opening an account — is a practical due-diligence step.
Simulating OCO on Platforms Without Native Support
For platforms without native OCO support, there are practical workarounds:
- For exit OCO: Set stop-loss and take-profit simultaneously when opening a position (as described above — the platform handles the mutual cancellation implicitly)
- For entry OCO: Place both pending orders, set price alerts at both trigger levels, and manually cancel the unfilled order immediately after one executes
- For automated entry OCO: Use a simple Expert Advisor script (available through many MT4/MT5 marketplaces) that implements OCO logic automatically
The manual workaround has a critical vulnerability: during fast-moving markets — exactly the conditions most likely to trigger an entry OCO — the gap between the first order executing and manual cancellation of the second order can result in both orders executing in a whipsaw. Understanding this limitation is why native platform support for OCO is preferable for active breakout traders.
OCO Orders and Risk Management: Position Sizing and Portfolio Exposure
OCO orders must be integrated within the same risk management framework that governs all trading activity. The structure of an OCO does not exempt it from the fundamental risk management disciplines that protect trading capital.
Position Sizing for OCO Breakout Entries
When placing an entry OCO breakout structure, the position size for each leg of the OCO must be calculated based on the 1% risk rule applied to that leg’s specific stop-loss distance. Since the buy stop and sell stop legs will have different stop-loss distances (depending on where the stop is placed for each), each leg may require a slightly different position size.
For a buy stop leg with a 60-pip stop-loss and a sell stop leg also with a 60-pip stop-loss (symmetrically placed), the position sizes would be identical. For asymmetric setups — where the buy stop’s stop is 40 pips and the sell stop’s stop is 80 pips — the position sizes should be different, with the buy stop using a larger position (because the stop is tighter and the 1% dollar risk accommodates more lots).
Maximum Portfolio Exposure With OCO Entries
An OCO entry structure reduces but does not eliminate the maximum risk it represents to your portfolio before either leg executes. While the OCO ensures only one direction results in a trade, that trade carries real risk. Multiple OCO structures across different pairs simultaneously represent multiple potential position openings — and therefore multiple potential margin consumptions.
Maintain the same total portfolio risk discipline with OCO entries as with all other positions: ensure that if all pending OCO orders trigger simultaneously, the total portfolio risk does not exceed your defined maximum (typically 5% to 10% of account equity). The mechanics of how position execution affects free margin and equity in your account are explained in our account management guides.
OCO and the Stop Out Mechanism
If an entry OCO triggers a position that begins moving adversely — and the stop-loss on that position is not hit before the account’s margin level deteriorates significantly — the broker’s stop out mechanism will close the position regardless of the OCO structure. An OCO does not exempt a position from the normal margin management framework. All the protections described in our guide on what is a stop out level in forex apply equally to positions opened via OCO orders.
Advanced OCO Applications: Multi-Level and Conditional Strategies
Beyond the fundamental entry and exit OCO structures, more sophisticated traders apply OCO logic in more complex strategic configurations.
Scaling Out With OCO
A common professional technique is to use multiple, tiered OCO exit pairs to scale out of a position at different price levels. Rather than a single take-profit target, the trader sets:
- OCO Pair 1: Take-profit at 1× ATR target OR stop-loss at original level — closes 50% of the position at the first target
- OCO Pair 2: Take-profit at 2× ATR target OR trailing stop (moved to break-even after pair 1 fires) — manages the remaining 50%
When the first target is reached and OCO Pair 1’s take-profit executes, 50% of the position is closed at a profit. The stop on the remaining position is simultaneously moved to break-even (removing all remaining risk), and the second take-profit target remains active. This structure locks in partial profits while giving the remaining position room to run toward a more ambitious target — with no remaining risk after the first target fires.
Using Technical Analysis to Set OCO Levels Precisely
The quality of any OCO structure is determined by the analytical quality of the price levels chosen for its orders. For entry OCO structures, these levels are the breakout triggers. For exit OCO structures, they are the stop-loss and take-profit levels.
Precision in level selection requires the full analytical toolkit: moving average support and resistance for dynamic level identification, RSI extremes for confirming overbought/oversold conditions at stop and target levels, Bollinger Band width and position for volatility context, and candlestick pattern analysis for precise price action confirmation at key levels. The combination of these tools with OCO order mechanics creates a technically rigorous, fully automated trade management structure.
OCO in Trending Markets: Continuation Breakouts
OCO orders are not only for range-bound consolidation breakouts. In trending markets, temporary consolidations within the larger trend provide excellent OCO entry opportunities: a buy stop above the consolidation high captures the continuation of the uptrend; a sell stop below the consolidation low provides protection against a trend reversal that might accelerate in the opposite direction.
Understanding the trend context — using moving averages to establish the primary trend direction before placing the OCO — allows the trader to size the continuation-direction order larger than the reversal-direction order, reflecting the higher-probability directional bias while still maintaining protection against the alternative scenario.
OCO Orders vs Other Order Structures: A Comparative Analysis
Understanding how OCO orders compare to other order structures and strategies helps clarify when they represent the optimal approach.
OCO vs Placing Two Independent Pending Orders
The fundamental risk of placing two independent pending orders on opposite sides of the market — without the OCO linkage — is the whipsaw scenario: the market triggers one order, then reverses and triggers the other, resulting in two simultaneous opposing positions. The OCO linkage eliminates this risk by guaranteeing mutual exclusivity. For any situation involving two-sided pending orders, OCO is always superior to unlinked independent orders.
OCO vs Manual Monitoring
Some traders prefer to monitor the market manually and place orders when they see the actual breakout rather than pre-setting pending orders. This approach avoids the whipsaw risk (since you can see the direction before entering) but requires constant screen presence at the time of the breakout, introduces human reaction time delay (potentially missing the best entry price), and is vulnerable to emotional decision-making under the pressure of a fast-moving market. OCO pending orders remove all of these disadvantages at the cost of requiring pre-analysis of the key levels.
OCO vs Options Strategies for Directional Uncertainty
For traders who have access to options markets, a long straddle (buying both a call and a put at the same strike) is the options-market equivalent of an entry OCO — profiting from a significant move in either direction. The straddle has the advantage of retaining both positions regardless of direction (no cancellation), but carries higher explicit cost (two option premiums). For most retail forex traders without options access, the OCO entry structure is the closest practical equivalent.
Common OCO Mistakes and Best Practices
As with all advanced order structures, OCO orders create specific error modes that traders should be aware of and actively avoid.
Mistake 1: Setting OCO Levels Too Close Together
Placing buy stops and sell stops within the normal noise range of the consolidation risks one or both orders being triggered by false moves before the genuine breakout. The buffer between each order and the nearest boundary should be at minimum the current bid-ask spread, and ideally an ATR-fraction (e.g., 0.2× to 0.5× of the current short-term ATR) to account for normal market noise at key levels.
Mistake 2: Forgetting to Attach Risk Management to Each Leg
Each order in an OCO entry pair must have its own stop-loss and take-profit attached. If only the OCO linkage is set — without stop-loss levels — the position that opens when one leg executes has no automated risk management, relying entirely on manual intervention. This creates exactly the unprotected exposure that the stop-loss and take-profit framework is designed to prevent.
Mistake 3: Not Reviewing OCO Orders After Market-Moving Events
An OCO entry structure placed in anticipation of a specific breakout can become invalid if the market dynamics change before the orders trigger. A geopolitical development, a fundamental news surprise, or a significant technical shift may render both the breakout thesis and the selected trigger levels obsolete. Regular review of outstanding OCO orders — particularly after any significant market development — is essential.
Mistake 4: Using OCO for Opposing Directional Convictions
OCO breakout orders work best when the trader genuinely does not have a strong directional preference — when the structure reflects real uncertainty about which direction will prevail. Using OCO when you actually have a clear directional view is counterproductive: you would be better served placing a single limit or stop order in the expected direction rather than maintaining both directions. Reserve OCO for genuine directional uncertainty and pre-defined breakout scenarios.
These errors connect to the broader discipline of avoiding emotional and impulsive trading decisions — a theme thoroughly addressed in our guide on common mistakes new investors and traders make and how to avoid them.
OCO in the Broader Context of Trading and Investing
OCO orders represent a specific, advanced expression of a universal principle that applies across all trading and investing: define your responses to possible future scenarios before they occur, so you are not making critical decisions under pressure when they do. This is the essence of scenario planning, and it is what separates disciplined, systematic traders from reactive, emotional ones.
The OCO structure — with its pre-defined responses to two alternative outcomes — is the mechanical implementation of this principle at the order level. The broader application of the same principle is found in the risk management framework for forex trading, in the asset allocation decisions that govern a diversified investment portfolio, and in the strategic frameworks that guide long-term investing. At every level of trading and investing sophistication, the discipline of planning before acting — rather than reacting when it is already happening — is what produces consistently better outcomes.
For traders working to build this discipline systematically, understanding OCO orders as a practical tool is valuable. But the underlying mindset — plan for scenarios, encode the plan, let the market play out — is the more important lesson that extends beyond any single order type.
Conclusion: OCO Orders Are the Structural Expression of Prepared Trading
The One Cancels the Other order is one of the most elegant structures in trading mechanics. It acknowledges something that most trading education ignores: that markets often present genuine two-directional uncertainty, and that the appropriate response is not to guess one direction and ignore the other, but to prepare for both — with full risk management on each — and let the market determine which path is taken.
Whether used as an entry OCO for breakout positioning during volatile, macro-uncertain market conditions, or as an exit OCO for the disciplined management of every open position’s stop-loss and take-profit pair, the OCO structure enforces pre-planned, emotionless execution at the critical moment when decisions most need to be made without hesitation.
Combined with the full technical and analytical toolkit — Bollinger Band squeeze identification and ATR-based volatility analysis for timing the OCO entry, moving average and RSI analysis for level identification, and the complete risk management framework for position sizing and portfolio exposure — OCO orders represent the professional standard for order management in uncertainty-rich market environments.
Plan both scenarios. Build the OCO. Let the market choose. This is not passive trading — it is active, disciplined preparation that gives you a structured, risk-managed response to whatever the market delivers.
—
© Zaye Capital Markets | Zaye Consulting | 138 Belgrave House, Dicken’s Yard, Long Field Avenue, London | info@zayecapitalmarkets.com
